<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV firmware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ourada.org/blog/archives/200/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ourada.org/blog/archives/200?&#038;owa_medium=feed&#038;owa_sid=</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:37:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.ourada.org/blog/archives/200/comment-page-1#comment-11871</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourada.org/blog/archives/200#comment-11871</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the whole remote/UI situation is less than great. People complain about the user interfaces on commercial computer software, but, whoo, consumer-electronics devices are often quite a bit worse.

I don&#039;t know if it&#039;ll ever happen, but I envision someday unbundling the whole remote-control aspect from all CE devices. Just give them a little serial/wireless network and standards by which to declare their functionality, then have a little box (OK, this _could_ be built into one of the larger devices to save another box) that marshals all the info together intelligently (I said &#039;intelligently&#039;!) and communicates to/from the single remote and/or a computer (like an HTPC). The remote would have buttons that are not spongy and unreliable, I might add.

But I don&#039;t know, if you have the &quot;suck total balls&quot; capability on your remote, you might want to keep that. Sounds pretty rare and useful. This integrated remote concept could also include a function to modulate that capability based on the content and rating of the current video...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the whole remote/UI situation is less than great. People complain about the user interfaces on commercial computer software, but, whoo, consumer-electronics devices are often quite a bit worse.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;ll ever happen, but I envision someday unbundling the whole remote-control aspect from all CE devices. Just give them a little serial/wireless network and standards by which to declare their functionality, then have a little box (OK, this _could_ be built into one of the larger devices to save another box) that marshals all the info together intelligently (I said &#8216;intelligently&#8217;!) and communicates to/from the single remote and/or a computer (like an HTPC). The remote would have buttons that are not spongy and unreliable, I might add.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t know, if you have the &#8220;suck total balls&#8221; capability on your remote, you might want to keep that. Sounds pretty rare and useful. This integrated remote concept could also include a function to modulate that capability based on the content and rating of the current video&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allanimal</title>
		<link>http://www.ourada.org/blog/archives/200/comment-page-1#comment-11870</link>
		<dc:creator>Allanimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourada.org/blog/archives/200#comment-11870</guid>
		<description>Could you come over and fix the horrendously funked-up UI on my TV. The people that designed it obviously never used it. 

And while we&#039;re at it, can we redesign the remote or the IR receiver (whichever parts make doing anything suck total balls)?

But at least it is a big flat-screen. At least it has that going for it.

Now that I have a HTPC, I only need to turn the TV on and off. Which can be a challenge, mind you, but at least the frustration level is reduced considerably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you come over and fix the horrendously funked-up UI on my TV. The people that designed it obviously never used it. </p>
<p>And while we&#8217;re at it, can we redesign the remote or the IR receiver (whichever parts make doing anything suck total balls)?</p>
<p>But at least it is a big flat-screen. At least it has that going for it.</p>
<p>Now that I have a HTPC, I only need to turn the TV on and off. Which can be a challenge, mind you, but at least the frustration level is reduced considerably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

